Safety leadership workspace

MRI Safety Program

Local assessment No current assessment entered

Program overview

Current evidence, critical controls and the next review decisions.

Current operational compliance has not been established. The supplied assessment is dated September 28, 2022. Its PASS result remains historical; current policies, observations and records are needed.
Verified controls0 / 40

Current evidence accepted

Critical controls unresolved29

Includes missing or expired evidence

Documented gaps0

0 gaps · 0 partial

Staff records entered0

0 current local competency records

Evidence readiness by domain

Verified / applicable

Select a domain to examine its controls. Unassessed controls stay in the denominator.

40 controls need current review

Verified ÷ applicable controls. This is a local evidence index, not an ACR or Joint Commission accreditation score.

Priority evidence queue

Critical first
2026 practice update

Turn the annual review into daily reliability.

  • Use the March 2026 ACR manual for current guidance.
  • Keep Level 2 screening and access responsibilities explicit.
  • Check unused conductors, coil connections and hearing protection.
  • Select the correct Joint Commission accreditation program.
· · ·
Clinical decisions remain with qualified MR personnel. This model supports local review and does not certify accreditation.

Compliance assessment

Review each control against policy, observed practice and dated evidence.

40 of 40 controls
Verified and N/A require a responsible reviewer, evidence or rationale, and a review date within 365 days. This is a local document-freshness rule. Confirm standard-specific intervals separately. Critical gaps are never hidden by the total score.
G01MR medical directorLeadership · Critical controlNot assessed

Named MRMD, defined clinical authority, qualifications and written responsibilities.

Evidence to examine

Appointment letter and approved role description

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
G02MR safety officerLeadership · Critical controlNot assessed

Named MRSO with operational responsibility and escalation coverage.

Evidence to examine

Appointment, competency and coverage plan

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
G03MR safety expertLeadershipNot assessed

Access to MRSE expertise for technical risk assessment and unusual cases.

Evidence to examine

Consultation arrangement and qualifications

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
G04Current safety policiesLeadershipNot assessed

Controlled policies accessible to all shifts and reviewed at least annually under the local program.

Evidence to examine

Approved policy set, review log and availability check

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
G05Staffing and escalationLeadership · Critical controlNot assessed

For routine operations, document a Level 2 MR technologist per scanner and an additional Level 1/2 MR person in Zone III available to respond; review complex and remote staffing models separately.

Evidence to examine

Staffing plan and escalation drill

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
A01Four-zone access planAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Identify Zones I–IV; supervise Zone III through Level 2 MR personnel and restrict entry.

Evidence to examine

Zone plan, access test and observation

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
A02Signs, doors and locksAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Check entry controls, hazard signage and always-on magnet warnings for the installed system.

Evidence to examine

Door/lock inspection and signage photographs

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
A03Screen every personAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Document patient, staff, caregiver and visitor screening with a defined update process. Screen conscious nonemergent patients twice, including at least once by Level 2 personnel.

Evidence to examine

Approved screening forms and de-identified audit

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
A04Final safety checkAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Use a final review by qualified MR personnel before entry/scanning; reconcile changes.

Evidence to examine

Direct observation and completed sample

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
A05Screening barriersAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Provide interpreters and an escalation pathway when history is unreliable or incomplete.

Evidence to examine

Interpreter workflow and escalation example

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
A06Objects and equipmentAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Verify every item entering restricted areas; ferromagnetic detection complements screening.

Evidence to examine

Inventory, labeling and equipment entry observation

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
A07Implant identityAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Resolve device identity, components, leads and authoritative labeling before clinical review.

Evidence to examine

Device investigation record and source reference

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · · ·
A08MR Conditional limitsAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Match all device conditions to scanner, coils and planned exam; do not extrapolate between field strengths.

Evidence to examine

Documented condition comparison and authorized decision

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · · ·
A09Unknown or complex device pathwayAccess & screening · Critical controlNot assessed

Hold unresolved cases for MRMD/designated expert review; prior successful MRI is insufficient evidence.

Evidence to examine

Written exception pathway and documented risk assessment

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · · ·
P01Thermal injury preventionPatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Assess clothing, skin contacts, conductive loops, patches, cables and padding.

Evidence to examine

Positioning observation and burn prevention checklist

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · · ·
P02Coils and conductorsPatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Inspect coils and connections; remove unused conductive items and unconnected coils from the bore.

Evidence to examine

Coil/cable inspection log and setup observation

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · · ·
P03Hearing protectionPatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Fit suitable protection; use plugs and muffs together whenever possible and verify function.

Evidence to examine

Fit check, alternative plan and competency observation

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
P04Communication and distressPatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Test the call device, maintain observation/communication and respond promptly to heat or distress.

Evidence to examine

Call device test and observed patient instruction

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
P05Pediatric patientsPatient protectionNot assessed

Address guardian history, developmentally appropriate private screening and monitoring.

Evidence to examine

Pediatric workflow and staff competency

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
P06Pregnancy in patientsPatient protectionNot assessed

Use a documented clinical benefit/risk pathway; distinguish noncontrast MRI from GBCA decisions.

Evidence to examine

MRMD-approved pregnancy and contrast policy

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
P07Pregnant personnelPatient protectionNot assessed

Define occupational activities and restrictions through current MR and employee-health guidance.

Evidence to examine

Approved staff pregnancy guidance

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
P08Contrast safetyPatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Assess prior reactions and agent-specific risks; verify order, agent, dose and appropriate renal-risk pathway.

Evidence to examine

Contrast protocol, medication checks and competency

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
· · ·
P09Contrast responsePatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Maintain trained response capability, reaction supplies, extravasation workflow and patient instructions.

Evidence to examine

Readiness check, protocol and drill

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
P10Sedation and anesthesiaPatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Define monitoring, rescue, recovery, discharge and MR-qualified support for sedation/anesthesia.

Evidence to examine

Privileges, monitoring plan and observed competency

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
P11Patient identity and examinationPatient protection · Critical controlNot assessed

Verify two identifiers, ordered exam, laterality when relevant and clinical handoff.

Evidence to examine

De-identified direct-observation audit

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
· · ·
P12Infection preventionPatient protectionNot assessed

Use approved coil/surface cleaning, MR-appropriate PPE and waste-handling workflows.

Evidence to examine

Cleaning instructions, supplies and observed technique

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
W01Role-specific orientationWorkforce · Critical controlNot assessed

Provide MR instruction before assigned work or entry; distinguish Level 1, Level 2 and escorted non-MR roles. Provide ACR-recommended annual education for designated Level 1 and Level 2 personnel.

Evidence to examine

Role matrix, orientation and access authorization

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program (supporting local/ACR control; the TJC EP specifically addresses technologists)
· · ·
W02Annual technologist educationWorkforce · Critical controlNot assessed

Document annual MRI technologist training on the required safety topics.

Evidence to examine

Dated annual education records and curriculum

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
W03Ancillary personnel readinessWorkforce · Critical controlNot assessed

Train transport, EVS, security, facilities and other entrants for their role and escort requirements.

Evidence to examine

Attendance, scenario practice and observed skills

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program (supporting local/ACR control; the TJC EP specifically addresses technologists)
· · ·
W04Competency and expired accessWorkforce · Critical controlNot assessed

Demonstrate skills and define what happens when training or authorization lapses.

Evidence to examine

Observed competency and access review log

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program (supporting local/ACR control; the TJC EP specifically addresses technologists)
· · ·
E01Emergency responseEmergency & equipment · Critical controlNot assessed

Rehearse medical, fire and security response, preserving access control and moving resuscitation to the designated safe area.

Evidence to examine

Written plan, response contacts and drill review

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
E02Emergency shutdown and quenchEmergency & equipment · Critical controlNot assessed

Distinguish scan stop, electrical shutdown and magnet quench; follow system-specific authority and indications.

Evidence to examine

OEM instructions, labeled controls and competency

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
E03Cryogen systemEmergency & equipment · Critical controlNot assessed

Where applicable, inspect cryogen/quench vent systems on the approved schedule and control work near discharge points.

Evidence to examine

Inspection and contractor briefing records. Uploaded checklist specifies annual pipe inspection; reconcile current OEM/local requirements.

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
E04Annual MRI performanceEmergency & equipment · Critical controlNot assessed

Qualified medical physicist or MRI scientist evaluates MRI performance and documents results annually.

Evidence to examine

Dated signed report and corrective action closure

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
E05Image display performanceEmergency & equipmentNot assessed

Test acquisition displays annually for required performance characteristics.

Evidence to examine

Dated display evaluation and resolution of findings

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · ·
E06Preventive maintenanceEmergency & equipment · Critical controlNot assessed

Maintain OEM-based service and periodic checks of equipment, safety interfaces and repaired items.

Evidence to examine

Maintenance plan, inspection log and return-to-use review

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
Q01Thermal injury surveillanceLearning & improvementNot assessed

Capture thermal injuries with or without actual burns and route them for review.

Evidence to examine

Defined reporting pathway and aggregate review log

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · · ·
Q02Ferromagnetic event surveillanceLearning & improvementNot assessed

Capture unintended ferromagnetic entry and associated injuries as distinct measures.

Evidence to examine

Event definitions, reporting workflow and review

Related standard / control theme: Select accreditation program
· · · ·
Q03Near misses and corrective actionsLearning & improvementNot assessed

Encourage good-catch reporting; assign accountable owners and verify effectiveness after closure.

Evidence to examine

Action register and effectiveness review

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·
Q04Program review and auditLearning & improvementNot assessed

Review trends, screening audits, training coverage and unresolved safety findings with leadership.

Evidence to examine

Committee minutes and improvement plan

Related standard / control theme: ACR / local control; other standards to confirm
·

Patient safety

Support the clinical workflow from first contact through safe handoff.

Know the four zones

Zone I · Public access

General public area. No permission to proceed into restricted areas.

Conceptual access diagram, not a site floor plan or a field-boundary survey. Use your physicist-approved layout.

Implant review: hold when unresolved

Identify device and all components
Obtain authoritative conditions
Match scanner, coil and exam limits
Authorized MR review documents decision

An unknown label or a prior successful MRI does not establish suitability. This dashboard cannot clear an implant or calculate device-specific scan limits.

Pre-scan team discussion

Session-only practice

Use alongside the approved clinical screening form. No patient data is entered or retained here.

8 discussion items remain. The assigned MR clinician retains the scan decision.

Respond to heat, pain or distress

Pause scanning, assess and remove the patient when needed. Investigate positioning, contacts and equipment before any decision to resume. Document symptoms and escalate through the clinical response pathway.

Emergency response

Activate the local plan and move the patient to the predetermined magnetically safe resuscitation area. Keep MR Unsafe code carts and defibrillators out of Zone IV. Do not treat electrical shutdown as removal of the magnetic field.

If evacuation is delayed, trained staff must not withhold necessary basic life support while the team continues rapid transfer and excludes MR Unsafe equipment. Quench decisions follow the system-specific emergency plan and designated authority.

·

Staff learning

Role-based learning, scenario assessment and observed competency records.

Learning does not grant independent MRI access. ACR recommends annual education for designated Level 1 and Level 2 personnel. The local MR leadership team assigns personnel level, verifies practical competency and authorizes access. The quiz uses a locally selected 80% learning benchmark.

MR Level 2 clinical personnel

Designated MR technologists and other clinicians whose assigned duties require advanced MR safety competence.

Own the final safety review

Review the patient's history, the completed screening record, current implants and external devices, and any unresolved information before the examination. Reconcile conflicting answers and follow the local pathway when a patient cannot provide a reliable history. A prior uneventful MRI is useful history but does not prove that today's device, scanner, or protocol is suitable. The screening process must end in a documented clinical decision by the responsible authorized personnel. For conscious nonemergent patients, use the required repeated screening process, including at least one interactive review by Level 2 MR Personnel.

Translate a device label into an examination plan

MR Conditional describes use under defined conditions. Identify the complete device system and use the current manufacturer instructions. Verify the permitted field strength, radiofrequency exposure metric and limit, coil restrictions, scan location, time limits, and any required programming or monitoring. Do not infer permission at 3 T from a 1.5 T label or assume a lower field is automatically safer. Escalate missing or conflicting conditions through the designated clinical review pathway.

Prevent thermal and acoustic injury

Before imaging, examine the selected coil and cable insulation, remove unused external conductors, and route required leads according to their instructions. Position and pad the patient to avoid conductive loops and unwanted skin contact. Confirm hearing protection is fitted correctly and remains in place. Teach the patient to report heating, pain, or excessive noise immediately. A patient who cannot reliably communicate requires an appropriate monitoring and observation plan. Use both plugs and muffs whenever possible, consistent with fit and manufacturer instructions.

Make safety observable

Maintain control of restricted access while positioning or caring for the patient. Use the final pre-entry pause to reconcile the person, equipment, examination, and restrictions. During a medical code, stop imaging and rapidly transfer the patient to the predetermined magnetically safe location. If transfer is delayed, trained staff must not withhold necessary basic life support; follow the emergency plan while excluding MR Unsafe equipment. Report near misses and verify that corrective actions improve practice.

Observed skills to demonstrate

  • Complete an observed screening interview and resolve one conflicting history item.
  • Locate current device instructions and explain which restrictions affect the proposed scanner and protocol.
  • Demonstrate patient padding, hearing protection fit, call device use, and required cable inspection.
  • Lead a final pre-entry pause and explain the emergency evacuation route.

Review the complete local policy and practice under an authorized trainer.

Scenario knowledge check

1. A patient says, 'My implant was fine in an MRI last year.' The model is still unknown. What is the next step?
2. A device label permits specified conditions at 1.5 T. The scheduled scanner is 3 T. What does the label support?
3. An unused surface coil is unplugged but remains beside the patient. What should happen?
4. The patient reports a hot sensation under a cable during a sequence. What is the appropriate response?
5. During a code, a responder pushes a conventional crash cart toward the scanner room. What is the MR team's priority?

Local competency register

Use a staff code. Keep signed institutional records in the approved education system. This register is stored only in this browser.

Staff codePathwayLast competencyLocal annual review status
No staff records entered. Department training coverage cannot yet be calculated.

365-day flag is a local planning convention, not a determination of access privilege or an accreditation interval for every role.

Patient education

Plain-language explanations for preparation and an informed conversation.

Before your MRI

Tell us. Ask us. Speak up.

Your MRI team needs your help to plan a safe examination.

01

Before your visit

Tell the MRI team about implants, operations, metal injuries, hearing devices, medicine pumps, wearable monitors, and other medical devices. Bring your implant card or device information if you have it. Tell us if you might be pregnant, need help with language or communication, or feel anxious in small spaces.

02

When you arrive

Expect us to ask safety questions again and review any changes. Follow our clothing and belongings instructions. Tell us about patches, tattoos, piercings, and items you cannot remove. A family member who comes into a restricted area must also complete the entry process.

03

During the scan

We will fit hearing protection and show you how to contact us. Use the call device immediately for pain, a hot or burning feeling, breathing difficulty, or excessive noise. Tell us if your hearing protection moves. You do not have to tolerate a problem to finish the scan.

04

Contrast or calming medicine

Some examinations use an injected contrast agent. Tell us about previous reactions and kidney problems. If sedation is planned, follow the specific preparation, escort, and driving instructions given by your care team. Ask before taking extra calming medicine.

Teach-back before scanning

  • How will you tell the team if you feel heat, pain or discomfort?
  • What device, surgery or change in your health do we still need to discuss?
  • Is your hearing protection comfortable and secure?

Ask for an interpreter or another way to communicate if you need one.

·

Check-off sheets

Reusable practice and audit forms for local approval.

MRI safety program · Check-off record

Daily MRI readiness

Use at opening, with escalation of unresolved safety issues before the affected activity.

Site / scanner: _________________________

Date / time: __________________________

Reviewer / role: _______________________

Policy / record reference: _______________

Verification stepDoneHoldN/A*
1. Required MR personnel coverage and role assignments confirmed.
2. Controlled doors, access controls, and warning signs checked.
3. Patient communication and call device checked using the approved method.
4. Coils, visible cable insulation, pads, and hearing protection inspected and available.
5. Approved transport and clinical support equipment available and labeled.
6. Emergency route and designated safe resuscitation area accessible.
7. Applicable emergency supplies and contrast response arrangements checked under local policy.
8. Cleaning supplies and process ready; unapproved equipment excluded.
9. Outstanding defects, restrictions, and work orders reviewed at handoff.
10. Any failed item assigned an owner and a documented interim control or service restriction.

*Document the reason for each N/A. A completed sheet does not substitute for clinical authorization.

Reviewer signature: ____________________

Required second review: ________________

Follow-up owner: _______________________

Due / closure date: ____________________

Template prepared for local MRMD/MRSO review. Check-off selections are session-only. Print to retain a completed record.

Quality & actions

Track events with denominators and document improvement follow-through.

Safety events per 1,000 examinations

No monthly observations entered

Add examinations and event counts to begin the trend. No synthetic facility results are displayed.

Monthly aggregate entry

Use counts from your incident system and exam register. Enter zero only when verified. Intercepted near misses exclude actual scanner-room entry.

MonthExamsThermalEntriesEntry events with injuryInterceptedScreening defect rate
No observations available.

One row per calendar month. Saving an existing month asks before replacing it. Audit rate uses audited records, not all exams.

Corrective action register

FindingOwner / dueActionStatus
No corrective actions entered.

Standards & evidence

Separate source authority, historical observations and local model decisions.

Program scope matters. Hospital identifiers below are effective January 2026. Ambulatory identifiers come from the 2026 survey guide. Confirm current applicability and exact language in the organization’s licensed manual. ACR guidance and local audit design are identified separately.

Joint Commission MRI crosswalk

Control areaHospital 2026Ambulatory 2026Evidence focus
Annual MRI technologist trainingNPG.13.01.01 EP 4HR.01.05.03 EP 25Dated annual records; MRI screening, positioning, hearing, burns, equipment, emergencies and cryogens
MRI-specific patient risksNPG.13.03.01 EP 1EC.02.01.01 EP 14Screening, implants/foreign bodies, ferromagnetism, noise, distress and urgent/emergent care
Restricted access and supervisionNPG.13.03.01 EP 2EC.02.01.01 EP 16Access controls, trained supervision, signs and observed practice
Annual MRI performance evaluationNPG.13.03.01 EP 6EC.02.04.03 EP 22Qualified physicist/MRI scientist report and corrective action records
Annual acquisition display testingPE.05.01.01 EP 3EC.02.04.03 EP 25Display performance evaluation and follow-up
Thermal injury dataNPG.13.04.01 EP 1PI.01.01.01 EP 34Aggregate thermal injury reports, including injuries without burns
Ferromagnetic entry and injuriesNPG.13.04.01 EP 1PI.01.01.01 EP 35Entry events and associated injuries separately captured

Sentinel Event Alert 38 is retired and is not used as a current enforceable standard. An annual safety-program assessment does not replace the annual equipment performance evaluation.

· ·

What the attachments establish

21 Yes marks and a historical PASS. The September 28, 2022 summary covers 18 safety policy topics and three compliance criteria. The redacted site cannot be attributed to this department.

The supporting pages ask whether policies fit the equipment, site and actual operations. Their scope informed the 40-control model.

Current evidence still needed
  • Approved current policies and role appointments
  • Observed screening and restricted-access practice
  • Training and competency records
  • Equipment evaluation and maintenance records
  • Incident, audit and improvement data

Interpret the readiness model

  • Verified: a local reviewer records supporting evidence and a current review date.
  • Partial or gap: the reviewer identifies incomplete or absent implementation.
  • Not assessed: evidence has not been reviewed; it is not proof of noncompliance.
  • Expired: a verified or N/A review exceeds this model’s 365-day freshness convention.
  • Approved N/A: documented rationale, reviewer and current date remove the control from the denominator.

Evidence readiness = verified applicable controls ÷ all applicable controls. Partial controls receive no verification credit. This unweighted local index has no validated predictive relationship to injury, inspection outcome or accreditation. Critical controls are listed separately. Do not compare organizations without consistent evidence methods.

Department event rates and training coverage are unavailable until local records are entered. No data from the 2022 assessment has been extrapolated into a current performance trend.

Why thermal protection deserves attention

Historical FDA reports analyzed by Delfino et al. (2019): 1,548 reports from 2008–2017. These are shares of reports, not per-exam incidence or this department’s outcomes.

Thermal59%
Mechanical11%
Projectile9%
Acoustic6%
Other categories15%

Other categories = 100% minus the four displayed category percentages. Voluntary/reporting-system limitations preclude comparison with local event rates. Current prevention priorities should also consider local findings.

·

Source register and research context

Supplied evidence · U1

MRI Safety Program Assessment Checklist, supplied scans

User-supplied MRI1.jpg–MRI6.jpg. The summary records PASS and 21 Yes marks (18 policy topics + 3 compliance criteria), dated September 28, 2022. Site and reviewer are redacted. Supporting pages include one duplicate pregnancy/contrast/burns page.

Historical scope and policy assertions only. No present-day operational audit or site attribution can be established.

Professional guidance · ACR26

ACR Manual on MR Safety (2026) ↗

American College of Radiology. (2026). ACR manual on MR safety. March 2026 edition.

Current professional guidance. Local controls expand the supplied checklist into evidence requests; they are not verbatim ACR requirements.

Professional guidance · ACRCH

Summary of changes to the ACR Manual (2026) ↗

American College of Radiology. (2026). Changes to ACR manual on MR safety.

2026 updates: Level 2 responsibilities, hearing protection, unused conductors and equipment checks.

Survey guidance · JC26A

Joint Commission 2026 Ambulatory Survey Activity Guide ↗

The Joint Commission. (2025). 2026 ambulatory care survey activity guide (pp. 87–89).

Ambulatory diagnostic-imaging document list and standards mapping; verify organization-specific scope in the licensed manual.

Regulatory education · FDA

MRI benefits and risks ↗

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Benefits and risks: MRI. Retrieved September 12, 2026.

Patient education on projectiles, heating, hearing protection, implants and sedation.

Patient education · RI

MRI safety for patients ↗

Radiological Society of North America & American College of Radiology. (n.d.). MRI safety. RadiologyInfo.org.

Plain-language patient preparation and communication.

Professional guidance · CONTRAST

ACR Manual on Contrast Media ↗

American College of Radiology. (n.d.). Manual on contrast media. Current resource accessed September 12, 2026.

Agent-specific contrast risk assessment, reactions and institutional protocols; no dosing calculator is provided.

Peer-reviewed review · PED25

American College of Radiology Manual on MR Safety: 2024 update and revisions ↗

Pedrosa, I., Altman, D. A., Dillman, J. R., Hoff, M. N., McKinney, A. M., Reeder, S. B., Rogg, J. M., Stafford, R. J., Webb, J. A., Hernandez, D. L., & Watson, R. E. (2025). American College of Radiology Manual on MR Safety: 2024 update and revisions. Radiology, 315(1), e241405.

Explains evidence and rationale behind the expanded ACR manual, including personnel, staffing and remote operation. Read with March 2026 manual changes rather than as the latest edition.

Peer-reviewed systematic review · BAKER24

Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention ↗

Baker, C., Nugent, B., Grainger, D., Hewis, J., & Malamateniou, C. (2024). Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 71(3), 445–460.

Synthesis of 79 articles and 19 grey literature sources identified removal of conductive items, insulation to prevent loops/contact and regular communication as practical prevention themes. The reported estimate that 97% of burns might be preventable is an inference from reviewed incidents, not an experimentally demonstrated facility effect or performance target. Do not depict it as expected local risk reduction.

Peer-reviewed expert consensus · KIM24

SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device ↗

Kim, D., et al. (2024). SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 26(1), 100995.

CIED scanning requires an organized pathway with device identification, clinical risk-benefit assessment, programming/interrogation resources and appropriate monitoring. Evidence supports selected patients under protocol; a pacemaker is neither automatic exclusion nor blanket clearance. Device-specific conditions, field strength, facility capabilities and electrophysiology support govern individual eligibility. Do not automate implant approval.

Peer-reviewed ACR–NKF consensus · WEINREB21

Use of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media in patients with kidney disease: Consensus statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation ↗

Weinreb, J. C., Rodby, R. A., Yee, J., Wang, C. L., Fine, D., McDonald, R. J., Perazella, M. A., Dillman, J. R., & Davenport, M. S. (2021). Use of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media in patients with kidney disease: Consensus statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology, 298(1), 28–35.

Group II agents have very low NSF risk, including in advanced kidney disease. Weigh harm of withholding an indicated examination against risk; routine dialysis changes are generally unnecessary solely because of group II GBCA. Historical agent group classifications in this article must be updated to the current ACR Contrast Manual. Do not use a generic eGFR threshold to auto-reject every examination.

Peer-reviewed retrospective surveillance study · DELFINO19

MRI-related FDA adverse event reports: A 10-yr review ↗

Delfino, J. G., Krainak, D. M., Flesher, S. A., & Miller, D. L. (2019). MRI-related FDA adverse event reports: A 10-yr review. Medical Physics, 46(12), 5562–5571.

In 1,548 analyzed FDA reports covering 2008–2017, thermal events represented 59%, mechanical events 11%, projectile events 9% and acoustic events 6%. These are shares of reported events, not complication incidence per MRI, contemporary national rates, causal estimates or local departmental data. If charted, visibly label historical surveillance evidence and the report denominator.

Local adoption and recordkeeping

MRMD and MRSO should review this model against the actual scanner, service scope, staffing, device pathways and emergency plan before operational adoption. Assign an owner to every critical control, test selected workflows by direct observation, and close findings with evidence of effectiveness.

Assessment entries, aggregate trends and coded staff records stay in this browser. They are not synchronized, authenticated signatures or an institutional audit trail. Export a dated backup and retain approved records in the organization’s controlled system. Do not enter patient identifiers or confidential clinical narratives.